Experiment code 17.2.3.84
Experiment Title Influence of Glufosinate ammonium on cotton yield and soil microbes
Research Type Departmental Research
Experiment Background India is the leading country in terms of area under cotton in the world. Gujarat, Maharashtra and Telangana are the major cotton growing states contributing around 70% of the area and 67% of cotton production in India. Globally, India is now at the first position in cotton cultivation with 12.24 mha area and 340.25 lakh bales of production (advance estimate for 2018-19 by Cotton Association of India 2019). However, weeds are still the major concern everywhere as they compete with crop for resources and make the crop vulnerable to insects and diseases by providing shelters for those harmful organisms and pathogens. If weeds are not checked on time, they may cause considerable or even full yield reduction of crop. Nandagavi and Halikatti (2016) highlighted that on an average, 40 to 85 % cotton yield can be reduced by weeds. Therefore, proper weed management practice is now the fundamental requisite for the cotton growers to address such drastic yield reduction. Hand weeding/interculture by far is the best and common conventional practice to manage weeds and consequently to increase yield and quality of cotton crop. However, in the present scenario of labour shortage and frequent rise of wages coupled with its non-suitability for all agro-climatic conditions uniformly, this uneconomical weeding option is losing focus and alternative options are getting acceptance in its place. Chemical measures of weed control is now gaining popularity among farmers as it is quick, economical and effective way to destroy weeds and contribute higher crop yield (Prematilake et al. 2004, Mirghasemi et al. 2012). In cotton, among several herbicidal applications, a contact herbicide, glufosinate ammonium (synthetic version of phosphinothricin i.e. by-product of bialaphos from Streptomyces viridochromogenes and S. hygroscopicus as reported by Droge-Laser et al. in 1994) is now receiving high attention and getting widely used for successful management of wide range of weed flora (Chompoo and Pornprom 2008) during critical crop weed competition period. However, chemical formulations always leave footprint on crop and soil since they are toxic in nature. Residual toxicity depends on chemical structure, formulation, dose, time and way of application of herbicides. Phytotoxic effect of herbicide on crop i.e. visual symptoms of chlorosis, wilting, scorching, necrosis, epinasty, hyponasty, yellowing etc. and impairment of soil biological activity through toxic substances are the major obstacles in use of chemical measures of weed control as their consequent effect is associated with growth and yield of the crop. Considering the above facts, an experiment will be executed to observe phytotoxic effects of glufosinate ammonium 13.5% SL (15% w/v) at different doses on cotton and soil micro-flora and their consequence on crop growth, yield and economics.
Experiment Group Natural Resource Management
Unit Type (02)EDUCATION UNIT
Unit (21)COLLEGE OF AGRICULTURE (BHARUCH)
Department (317)Agronomy
BudgetHead (337/12946/0A)337/01/REG/00351
Objective

To study the weed flora of cotton

To evaluate the efficiency of Glufosinate ammonium application on weed control and   growth and yield of cotton

To know the microbial status of soil and influenced under Glufosinate ammonium application

Season Kharif
Location Unit Type (01)RESEARCH UNIT
Location Unit (50)REGIONAL COTTON RESEARCH STATION MAKTAMPURA (BHARUCH)
Location Department (276)Agronomy
Plot No 6-A
PI Name (NAU-EMP-2013-000671)TUSHARKUMAR UMEDBHAI PATEL
PI Email tushagri.ank@nau.in
PI Mobile 8128698953
Year of Approval 2021
Commencement Year 2021
Completion Year 2023
Design of Experiment

Randomized block design (RBD

Crop Spacing (cm x cm)

120 cm X 45 cm

Gross Plot (m x m) 6.0 m X 4.5 m
Net Plot (m x m) 3.6 m X 2.7 m
Total Experiment Area (m2) 1056
Plot History Last Three Year

Cotton

240:40 kg NP2O5/ha 

Initial Soil Sample Analysis Report

Soil analysis

:

Initial year -2021

 

Items

 

 

 

Items

 

 

a)

pH

:

8.10

d)

Available N

:

210

b)

EC

:

0.243

e)

Available P2O5

:

33

c)

Organic carbon

:

0.28

f)

Available K2O

:

459

 

Initial Soil Sample Analysis Report Attachment
Layout Plan

Repli. -I

 

W1

W6

W2

W5

W7

W4

W3

 

Water channel (2.0 meters)

Repli. -II

W4

W5

W6

W1

W2

W3

W7

 

Water channel (2.0 meters)

Repli. -III

W7

W6

W5

W4

W3

W2

W1

 

Water channel (2.0 meters)

Repli. -IV

W1

W2

W3

W4

W5

W6

W7

Layout Plan Attachment
Treatment

W1

:

Glufosinate ammonium 13.5% SL (15% w/v) 350 g/ha EPoE

W2

:

Glufosinate ammonium 13.5% SL (15% w/v) 450 g/ha EPoE

W3

:

Glufosinate ammonium 13.5% SL (15% w/v) 350 g/ha EPoE + HW and IC at 50 DAS

W4

 

Glufosinate ammonium 13.5% SL (15% w/v) 450 g/ha EPoE + HW and IC at 50 DAS

W5

:

Pendimethalin 0.9 kg/ha PE fb Quizalofop-ethyl 50 g/ha  at 50 DAS

+ Pyrithiobac sodium 75 g/ha as PoE (tank mix)

W6

:

Weed free check (HW and IC at 20, 40 and 60 DAS)

W7

:

Weed check

Treatment Attachment
(NAU-EMP-2013-000671) TUSHARKUMAR UMEDBHAI PATEL tushagri.ank@nau.in 8128698953 15-01-2024
Active
(NAU-EMP-2014-000610) HIRENKUMAR HARESHLAL PATEL hhpatel@nau.in 9428325292 17/04/2021
Active
(NAU-EMP-1989-000635) MUKESHKUMAR LALLUBHAI PATEL mlpatel@nau.in 9427101097 17/04/2021
Active
(NAU-EMP-2013-001748) JAIMIN RAMESHCHANDRA PANDYA jrpandya@nau.in 8238230428 17/04/2021
Active
(NAU-EMP-2006-000602) DIVYESHKUMAR DURLABHBHAI PATEL ddpatel@nau.in 9725006015 17/04/2021
Active
Cotton G. Cot. Hy. -12 BG II