Experiment code 17.10.3.25
Experiment Title Standardization of formulation for preparation of fruit bar from sapota pulp
Research Type Departmental Research
Experiment Background Sapota [ManilkaraachrasFosberg] belongs to Sapotaceae family. Sapota was first introduced to India during late nineteenth century and its cultivation was first taken up in Maharashtra. Fully ripened sapota fruits are delicious and eaten as a dessert fruit. One hundred gram of edible portion of ripe sapota fruit contains, carbohydrates (21.49 g), protein (0.7 g), fat (1.1 g), calcium (28 mg), phosphorus (27 mg), Iron (2 mg), ascorbic acid (6 mg) and beta carotene (97 mg). It also has a lot of dietary fibre. Sapota production is steadily increasing in India due to expansion of area under cultivation and improved production technology and; but the inadequacies of handling, storage, transportation and marketing pose problem during glut season which results in heavy postharvest loss ranging from 25 to 40 per cent. Concentration is one of the best alternatives for long term preservation of the produce. However, technology for sapota fruit bar is lacking and the process for fruit bar is very tedious. Among different processed products, sapota based fruit bar can be one of the methods for preserving fruits for its off-season availability, which is concentrated product made from fruit pulp, with a chewy texture and mouth feel. Fruit bar is high calorie food and is a rich source of the vitamins and minerals. Fruit bar, being principally made up from fruit pulp, retains most of these ingredients and form a good nutritional supplement. Presently table sugar which is known as empty calorie food is being added to increase the TSS of fruit bar. Sugarcane juice is extracted from the pressed sugarcane which is rich source of potassium, calcium, iron, and vitamin B beside sugars. Recently, processors have faced the market competition for such products. So, they can add more value to their products by the mean of blending of sugarcane juice. In case of bar, there is a vast possibility to add further value by formulation. Now-a-days, formulation is recent trend; which enhances the nutritive value of product as well as beneficial for the health of consumers. So keeping all the problems in mind, the present investigation shall be taken with following objectives.
Experiment Group Horticulture
Unit Type (02)EDUCATION UNIT
Unit (13)ASPEE COLLEGE OF HORTICULTURE (NAVSARI)
Department (218)Post Harvest Technology,ACHF, Navsari
BudgetHead (329/12935/00)329/01/REG/00285
Objective

Objectives:

  1. To study the effect of sugarcane juice proportion and KMS concentration on quality of fruit bar from sapota pulp
  2. To study the quality parameters of fruit bar during storage.
Season Not season specific
Location Unit Type (02)EDUCATION UNIT
Location Unit (13)ASPEE COLLEGE OF HORTICULTURE (NAVSARI)
Location Department (218)Post Harvest Technology,ACHF, Navsari
Plot No PHT Lab
PI Name (NAU-EMP-2012-000868)DEV RAJ BAKASHI RAM -
PI Email drpandir_phtc@nau.in
PI Mobile 9913753252
Year of Approval 2022
Commencement Year 2022
Completion Year 2024
Design of Experiment

CRD with factorial concept

Crop Spacing (cm x cm)

Nil

Gross Plot (m x m) Nil
Net Plot (m x m) Nil
Total Experiment Area (m2) Nil
Plot History Last Three Year

Nil

Initial Soil Sample Analysis Report

Nil

Initial Soil Sample Analysis Report Attachment Attachment Not Available!
Layout Plan

Nil

Layout Plan Attachment Attachment Not Available!
Treatment

Treatment details:

Factor 1. Blending Proportion (B)

Treatment

Sapota Pulp (%)

Sugarcane juice (%)

B1

90

10

B2

80

20

B3

70

30

B4

60

40

B5

50

50

Factor 2. Potassium metabisulphite (K):

                        K1: Control

K2: 50 ppm

K3: 100 ppm

K4: 150 ppm

Treatment Combinations: 20

Details of Treatment Combinations

B1 K1

B2 K1

B3 K1

B4 K1

B5 K1

B1 K2

B2 K2

B3 K2

B4 K2

B5 K2

B1 K3

B2 K3

B3 K3

B4 K3

B5 K3

B1 K4

B2 K4

B3 K4

B4 K4

B5 K4

Number of Repetitions =3

Design: CRD with factorial concept

Sample size = 50 g (Finish product)

No of samples per treatment per repetition =20

Binding agent: 0.5 % Pectin

Packaging material:400 Gauge HDPE Bag

Storage: at ambient temperature

Observations:Storage study at 0, 3, 6, 9 months of storage

Treatment Attachment
(NAU-EMP-2012-000868) DEV RAJ BAKASHI RAM - drpandir_phtc@nau.in 9913753252 25-02-2024
Active
(NAU-EMP-2009-000857) ASHOKKUMAR APRATICHARAN SENAPATI aksphtc@nau.in 9638911247 15/05/2022
Active
(NAU-EMP-2015-000908) NILAMBEN VINUBHAI PATEL nilampatelphtc@nau.in 7600096697 15/05/2022
Active
(NAU-EMP-2013-000924) FAKIR MOHAN SAHU fmsphtc@nau.in 9879123286 15/05/2022
Active
Sapota Kalipatti