Experiment code ENT-01
Experiment Title Screening of insect pests of SSVT(E)/LSVT(E)/SSHT(M)/LSHT(M) entries of pigeonpea
Research Type NARP Project
Experiment Background Host plant resistance is one of the important and ecofriendly and long term solution for minimizing pest infestation to a tolerable level, hence, this experiment is formulate and conduct during the year.
Experiment Group Agricultural Entomology
Unit Type (02)EDUCATION UNIT
Unit (21)COLLEGE OF AGRICULTURE (BHARUCH)
Department (324)Agril. Entomology
BudgetHead (337/07081/0C)337/12/REG/00699
Objective

To screen  SSVT(E)/LSVT(E)/SSHT(M)/LSHT(M) pigeon pea genotypes for their susceptibility against pod borer and pod fly

Season Kharif
Location Unit Type (01)RESEARCH UNIT
Location Unit (51)NATIONAL AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH PROJECT (BHARUCH)
Location Department (258)Agril. Entomology
Plot No 10
PI Name (NAU-EMP-1991-000674)RAJENDRA BAHECHARBHAI PATEL
PI Email rbpatel@nau.in
PI Mobile 9825450983
Year of Approval 2016
Commencement Year 2018
Completion Year 2029
Design of Experiment

RBD

Crop Spacing (cm x cm)

150 x 20 

Gross Plot (m x m) 4.0 x 3.0
Net Plot (m x m) 3.6 x2.6
Total Experiment Area (m2) 2310
Plot History Last Three Year
Initial Soil Sample Analysis Report
Initial Soil Sample Analysis Report Attachment Attachment Not Available!
Layout Plan

ROAD 1.5 m

 

PN-116

G-16

PN-115

G-4

PN-114

G-6

PN-113

G-8

PN-112

G-10

PN-111

G-12

PN-110

G-14

PN-109

G-16

PN-108

G-18

PN-107

G-20

PN-106

G-22

PN-105

G-24

PN-104

G-26

PN-103

G-28

PN-102

G-30

R-II

ROAD 1.5 m

PN-87

G-1

PN-88

G-58

PN-89

G-56

PN-90

G-54

PN-91

G-52

PN-92

G-50

PN-93

G-48

PN-94

G-46

PN-95

G-44

PN-96

G-42

PN-97

G-40

PN-98

G-38

PN-99

G-36

PN-100

G-34

PN-101

G-32

ROAD 1.5 m

PN-86

G-3

PN-85

G-5

PN-84

G-7

PN-83

G-9

PN-82

G-11

PN-81

G-13

PN-80

G-15

PN-79

G-17

PN-78

G-19

PN-77

G-21

PN-76

G-23

PN-75

G-25

PN-74

G-27

PN-73

G-29

ROAD 1.5 m

PN-59

G-57

PN-60

G-55

PN-61

G-53

PN-62

G-51

PN-63

G-49

PN-64

G-47

PN-65

G-45

PN-66

G-43

PN-67

G-41

PN-68

G-39

PN-69

G-37

PN-70

G-35

PN-71

G-33

PN-72

G-31

1infestor row of  BDN-711  after 2 genotypes

 

PN-58

G-58

PN-57

G-57

PN-56

G-56

PN-55

G-55

PN-54

G-54

PN-53

G-53

PN-52

G-52

PN-51

G-51

PN-50

G-50

PN-49

G-49

PN-48

G-48

PN-47

G-47

PN-46

G-46

PN-45

G-45

PN-44

G-44

R-I

ROAD 1.5 m

PN-29

G-29

PN-30

G-30

PN-31

G-31

PN-32

G-32

PN-33

G-33

PN-34

G-34

PN-35

G-35

PN-36

G-36

PN-37

G-37

PN-38

G-38

PN-39

G-39

PN-40

G-40

PN-41

G-41

PN-42

G-42

PN-43

G-43

ROAD 1.5 m

PN-28

G-28

PN-27

G-27

PN-26

G-26

PN-25

G-25

PN-24

G-24

PN-23

G-23

PN-22

G-22

PN-21

G-21

PN-20

G-20

PN-19

G-19

PN-18

G-18

PN-17

G17

PN-16

G16

PN-15

G-15

ROAD 1.5 m

PN-01

G-1

PN-02

G-2

PN-03

G-3

PN-04

G-4

PN-05

G-5

PN-06

G-6

PN-07

G-7

PN-08

G-8

PN-09

G-9

PN-10

G-10

PN-11

G-11

PN-12

G12

PN-13

G13

PN-14

G-14

SSVT(E)/LSVT(E)/SSHT(M)LSHT(M): 58 GENOTYPES, 2Rows/entry, 1infestor row of  UPAS-120   after 2 genotypes

Layout Plan Attachment Attachment Not Available!
Treatment

Sr.No.

Genotypes

Random Plot No.

R-I

R-II

01

01.KP-25-01

01

87

02

02.KP-25-02

02

116

03

03.KP-25-03

03

86

04

04.KP-25-04

04

115

05

05.KP-25-05

05

85

06

06.KP-25-06

06

114

07

07.KP-25-07

07

84

08

08.KP-25-08

08

113

09

09.KP-25-09

09

83

10

10.KP-25-10

10

112

11

11.KP-25-11

11

82

12

12.KP-25-12

12

111

13

13.KP-25-13

13

81

14

14.KP-25-14

14

110

15

15.KP-25-15

15

80

16

16.KP-25-16

16

109

17

17.KP-25-17

17

79

18

18.KP-25-18

18

108

19

19.KP-25-19

19

78

20

20.KP-25-20

20

107

21

21.KP-25-21

21

77

22

22.KP-25-22

22

106

23

23.KP-25-23

23

76

24

24.KP-25-24

24

105

25

25.KP-25-25

25

75

26

26.KP-25-26

26

104

27

27.KP-25-27

27

74

28

28.KP-25-28

28

103

29

29.KP-25-29

29

73

30

30.KP-25-30

30

102

31

31.KP-25-31

31

72

32

32.KP-25-32

32

101

33

33.KP-25-33

33

71

34

34.KP-25-34

34

100

35

35.KP-25-35

35

70

36

36.KP-25-36

36

99

37

37.KP-25-37

37

69

38

38.KP-25-38

38

98

39

39.KP-25-39

39

68

40

40.KP-25-40

40

97

41

41.KP-25-41

41

67

42

42.KP-25-42

42

96

43

43.KP-25-43

43

66

44

44.KP-25-44

44

95

45

45.KP-25-45

45

65

46

46.KP-25-46

46

94

47

47.KP-25-47

47

64

48

48.KP-25-48

48

93

49

49.KP-25-49

49

63

50

50.KP-25-50

50

92

51

51.KP-25-51

51

62

52

52.KP-25-52

52

91

53

53.KP-25-53

53

61

54

54.KP-25-54

54

90

55

55.KP-25-55

55

60

56

56.KP-25-56

56

89

57

57.KP-25-57

57

59

58

58.KP-25-58

58

88

 

Helicoverpa: The least larval count of Helicoverpa (1.224) was observed in the genotypes  namely KP-25-27,KP-25-31,KP-25-40 and KP-25-42,however, they were not significantly differ from the genotypes KP-25-01,KP-25-03,KP-25-09,KP-25-11,KP-25-12,KP-25-13,KP-25-16,KP-25-18,KP-25-20,KP-25-21,KP-25-22,Kp-25-26,KP-25-28,KP-25-30,KP-25-33,KP-25-35,KP-25-36,KP-25-37,KP-25-43,KP-25-47,KP-25-49,KP-25-50,KP-25-51and KP-25-53. The highest Helicoverpa larval count (1.923) was found in the genotype namely KP-25-05 but it was not significantly differ from  KP-25-06.

Maruca: The significantly least larval count of Maruca (1.095) was observed in  the genotypes KP-25-51,KP-25-41,KP-25-38 and KP-25-31and they were statistically atpar the genotypes KP-25-23,KP-25-27,KP-25-32,KP-25-37 and KP-25-48. The  highest Maruca larval  count  (1.703) was found in the genotype KP-25-07 but it was not significantly differ from the genotypes KP-25-05 and KP-25-06.

Pod Damage Percent due to Helicoverpa: The significantly highest pod damage percent due to pod borer (40.046) was observed in the genotype KP-25-05 and it was stastically atpar with the genotype KP-25-06. The least pod damage percent (17.425) was recorded in the genotype KP-25-40 but it was not significantly differ from the genotypes KP-25-16,KP-25-27,KP-25-31,KP25-42,Kp-25-47,KP-25-49and KP-25-53.

 Pod Damage Percent due to Maruca: The highest pod damage percent due to pod borer (30.231) was observed in the genotype KP-25-05 and it was it was statistically at par with the genotypes KP-25-04,KP-25-06,KP-25-07,KP-25-24,KP-25-46 and KP-25-54. The least pod damage percent (14.670) was recorded in the genotype namely KP25-31 and KP-25-51,however, they were  not significantly differ from the genotypesKP25-01,KP-25-09,KP-25-12,KP-25-16,KP-25-19,KP-25-22,KP-25-23,KP-25-29,KP-25-30,KP-25-37,KP-25-38,KP-25-40,KP-25-41,Kp-25-50,Kp-25-52,Kp-25-56 and KP-25-57.

Pod flies: The least pod fly maggot/pupa count (2.343) was observed in the genotype KP-25-43 and it was statistically at par with the genotypes KP-25-09,KP-25-12,KP-25-13,KP-25-16,KP-25-24,KP-25-28,Kp-25-32,Kp-25-37,Kp-25-42 and Kp-25-47. The highest maggot count of pod fly (4.413) was observed in the genotype KP-25-07 and it was not significantly  differ from the genotypes KP-25-02,KP-25-05,KP-25-06,KP-25-11 and KP-25-55. The least pod damage percent due to pod fly (13.978) was found in the genotype KP-25-43,however, it was not significantly differ from the genotypes KP-25-09,KP-25-40 and KP-25-47. The   highest pod damage percent (29.317) was observed in KP-25-07 and it was  statistically at par with the genotypes KP-25-06,KP-25-11 and KP-25-19. 

The genotypes namely KP-25-27,KP-25-31,KP-25-40 and KP-25-42 were consider as tolerant while genotypes namely KP-25-05,KP-25-06 and KP-25-07 were found susceptible  against pod borers.

The genotypes namely KP-25-09, KP-25-12 and KP-25-47 were found to be tolerant where as the genotypes namely KP-25-05,KP-25-06,KP-25-11 and KP-25-19 were found susceptible against podfly attack.

Treatment Attachment Attachment Not Available!
(NAU-EMP-1991-000674) RAJENDRA BAHECHARBHAI PATEL rbpatel@nau.in 9825450983 18-02-2026
Active
Pigeon Pea Vaishali