Experiment code 18.9.3.61
Experiment Title Assessment of income inequality among agricultural households in Gujarat.
Research Type Study
Experiment Background Gujarat is among the few states that achieved high growth rate in agriculture sector. In year 2019-20, gross state value added of agriculture and allied sector at constant (2011-12) Prices was 10.89 percent which is much above the national average of 4.30 percent. Share of gross state value added (GSVA) of agriculture and allied sector in total GSVA of state at current prices found to be 15.63 percent which is below national average of 18.40 percent in 2019-20. Despite of persistent significant growth in agriculture sector, around 20 percent population still living below poverty. The strategy for inclusive growth requires policy instruments which can ensure fair distribution of income.The average monthly income per agricultural household stood at Rs.7926 in 2012–13, which is higher than the all-India average Rs. 6426. But the growth rate of income (3.4%) is marginally lower than that achieved at the all-India level (3.5%). It creates some confusion as Gujarat‘s agricultural GDP growth during this period was more than the all-India average (almost 5.7% per annum). It is immensely important that agricultural households should diversify the income sources as it is getting dire attention at national and international level. In Gujarat the percent rural population engaged in as agricultural labour is more than that of cultivators. A major share of agricultural household income came from wages (40.3%) followed by income from the cultivation (31.4%) and livestock (22.2%) sector and net receipts from non-farm activities (6.0%) in 2015. It can be seen that most of the studies on income inequality has been carries out at country level in Indian context (Birthal et al. 2014, Chakravorty et al. 2016, Ranganathan, 2018, Das and Srivastava, 2021). However, clear understanding of role of regional disparities in income inequality and distributional impact of income sources is the prerequisites to form consolidated pro-poor policies. In this very concern, the attempt will be made to ascertain the income inequality among agricultural households prevailing at different regional and district level.
Experiment Group Social Science
Unit Type (02)EDUCATION UNIT
Unit (15)ASPEE AGRIBUSINESS MANAGEMENT INSTITUTE (NAVSARI)
Department (281)ASPEE Agribusiness Managment Institute, NAU, Navsari
BudgetHead (341/12951/00)341/01/REG/00363
Objective

1. To study the regional disparities in income of agricultural households from various
sources
2. To find out overall income inequality of agricultural households
3. To assess the share of individual income source to total income inequality

PI Name (NAU-EMP-2013-000974)VISHAL SHANKAR THORAT
PI Email vishalthorat@nau.in
PI Mobile 8469552697
Year of Approval 2022
Commencement Year 2022
Completion Year 2024
Research Methodology

Methodology:
Data:
Secondary data pertaining to income from various sources viz. cultivation, livestock, wages & salary and non-farm business sourced from 77th round Land and Livestock Holdings of Households and Situation Assessment of Agricultural Households (January – December 2019) and 70th round situation assessment survey of agricultural house holds of the National Sample Survey Office, Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation (MOSPI), Government of India (GoI). The survey has been conducted in two visits V1 (January -August 2019) and V2 (September- December 2019) and canvassed 2128 and 2077 agricultural households in Gujarat in two visits respectively. An agricultural household was defined as that which received an income of more than INR 4000 from agricultural activities and had at least one member self-employed in agriculture, either in the principal status or in subsidiary status during the last 365 days.
Analytical tools:
1. In order to fulfil first objective, the four major sources of income in the state viz. cultivation, livestock, wages & salary and non-farm business are identified. Cross tabulation will be made in order to study the regional and district wise disparities in the income. In order to carry regional analysis, five NSS regions of Gujarat viz. South Eastern, Plains Northern, Dry areas, Kachchh and Saurastra will be taken into consideration.
2. Gini coefficient and Palma ratio will be calculated to find out overall income inequality among agricultural households‘ region and district wise. The Gini coefficient is a single number that demonstrates a degree of inequality in a distribution of income. he Gini coefficient is the cumulative shortfall from equal share of the total income up to each percentile. That summed shortfall is then divided by the value it would have in the case of complete equality. The Palma ratio is the ratio of the top 10% of the population‘s share of income divided by the poorest 40%‘s share. 3. Third objective of the study of assessment of the share of individual income source to total income inequality will be achieved by using the source decomposition of the Gini coefficient.Decomposition of the Gini coefficient shows the share of inequality of individual source to total inequality and the marginal effect of individual income source of income to total inequality level. Following Lerman and Yitzhaki (1985) the Gini coefficient for total income inequality, G, will be computed as follows:
????= ????????????????????????????????=1 (1)
where Skrepresents the share of source k in total income and reflects how important the income source is with respect to total income; Gkis the source Gini corresponding to the distribution of income from source k indicating equality/inequality of income distribution from a given income source and Rkis the Gini correlation of income from source k with the distribution of total income indicating how a given income source is correlated to the total income of a household. In eq. 1 ????????=???????????? (2) ????????=2???????????? ????????,???????? ???????? (3) ????????=???????????? ????????,???? ???????????? ????????,???????? (4)
Where mkis the mean income from income source k, Cov(Yk, Fk) is the covariance between income component k and its cumulative distribution and Cov(Yk, F) is the covariance between income component k and cumulative distribution of total income. The share of income inequality of the income component (Si) can be described as, ????????=???????????????????????????? (5)

From Equation 1 the partial differentiation of the overall Gini coefficient with respect to percentage change (????)in the source of income k can be computed by the following equation. ????????????????????=???????? ????????????????−???? (6)
Then, the marginal effect of the income source relative to the overall Gini can be obtained by dividing eq. (6) by overall Gini coefficient (G) as follows ???????????????????? ????=????????????????????????????−????????=????????−???????? (7)
Theil index is also important tool which has wide applicability in measurement of inequality. The key advantage of Theil index is that, unlike the Gini coefficient, the total amount of inequality measured by it can be decomposed into two additive components of between-group and within-group inequality as ????= ???????????? ????????=1 ???? ???????? ???????? ???? ???????? + ???????????????? ???????? ????????????????=1 (8)
where m equals the number of groups (regions in our case), N and Nm the total number of households and the number of households in group m respectively, Ym the monthly income of a household in group m and Y is the mean income of all households. The first and second terms in the eq. (8) represents between-group and within-group inequality respectively.

(NAU-EMP-2013-000974)
VISHAL SHANKAR THORAT
vishalthorat@nau.in 8469552697 30-01-2023
Active
(NAU-EMP-2007-000399)
RUCHIRA ABHISHEK SHUKLA
ruchira.shukla@nau.in 9725018793 30/01/2023
Active
(NAU-EMP-2014-000353)
YOGESH ASHOK GARDE
y.garde@nau.in 8469764778 30/01/2023
Active
(NAU-EMP-2010-000397)
SWATI SATYANARAYAN SHARMA
swati.sharma@nau.in 9662913378 30/01/2023
Active
Sr. No. Operation Date Nature of Data Value of Data Operation Status
1 01/02/2023 Secondary In Progress
Sr. No. Operation Date Operation Status
1 01/02/2023 In Progress
Sr. No. Operation Date Operation Status
1 01/02/2023 In Progress
Sr. No. Operation Date Operation Status
1 01/02/2023 In Progress